{
  "$comment": "Machine-readable companion to https://valem.run/calculators/brazil/holiday-entitlement. Formula, inputs, outputs, engine-verified test vectors, cited sources and the re-runnable Valem ModelSpec behind the page.",
  "url": "https://valem.run/calculators/brazil/holiday-entitlement",
  "dataUrl": "https://valem.run/calculators/brazil/holiday-entitlement.json",
  "license": {
    "name": "CC BY 4.0",
    "url": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
    "attribution": "Brazil férias model by Valem (https://valem.run/calculators/brazil/holiday-entitlement), CC BY 4.0.",
    "note": "Covers the model — the expression of each rule and the arrangement of the catalog. The rates and thresholds themselves are law and are not licensed by anyone; the cited sources are where they come from."
  },
  "verificationUrl": "https://valem.run/calculators/brazil/holiday-entitlement/verify",
  "country": "brazil",
  "countryName": "Brazil",
  "formula": "holiday-entitlement",
  "formulaName": "Férias",
  "title": "Cálculo De Férias 2026 — 30, 24, 18 Ou 12 Dias Corridos",
  "answer": "Article 130 of the CLT grants férias after each twelve months of contract, in one of four proportions chosen by unjustified absences: 30 dias corridos for up to five absences, 24 for six to fourteen, 18 for fifteen to twenty-three, and 12 for twenty-four to thirty-two. They are consecutive calendar days, so 30 of them is about 21,4 working days on a five-day week.",
  "lang": "en",
  "currency": "BRL",
  "taxYear": "2026",
  "verification": {
    "claim": "internal-consistency",
    "statement": "The Valem engine reproduces this model's stated formula through 12 self-test cases (below, and re-runnable against the spec). That asserts internal consistency, NOT that the formula matches current law — the cited sources are the evidence for that, and carry the date each was last checked.",
    "selfTestCases": 12,
    "ratesAreIllustrative": false,
    "sourcesCheckedOn": "2026-10-11"
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "label": "CLT (Decreto-Lei 5.452/1943) art. 130 — planalto.gov.br (férias after each twelve months; 30, 24, 18 and 12 dias corridos by unjustified absences)",
      "url": "https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del5452.htm",
      "checked": "2026-10-11"
    }
  ],
  "terminalOutput": "daysRemaining",
  "headlineOutput": "daysEntitled",
  "inputs": [
    {
      "name": "monthsWorked",
      "type": "number",
      "label": "Months completed in this período aquisitivo",
      "minimum": 0,
      "maximum": 12
    },
    {
      "name": "unjustifiedAbsences",
      "type": "number",
      "label": "Unjustified absences (faltas) in the period",
      "minimum": 0,
      "maximum": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "daysPerWeek",
      "type": "number",
      "label": "Days you work per week",
      "minimum": 1,
      "maximum": 7
    },
    {
      "name": "daysTaken",
      "type": "number",
      "label": "Days already taken",
      "minimum": 0
    }
  ],
  "outputs": [
    {
      "name": "bandDaysCorridos",
      "type": "number",
      "formula": "($a := $n(unjustifiedAbsences); $a <= $const.absenceLimit5 ? $const.bandDaysTo5Absences : ($a <= $const.absenceLimit14 ? $const.bandDaysTo14Absences : ($a <= $const.absenceLimit23 ? $const.bandDaysTo23Absences : ($a <= $const.absenceLimit32 ? $const.bandDaysTo32Absences : 0))))"
    },
    {
      "name": "daysCorridosEntitled",
      "type": "number",
      "formula": "($m := $clampFloorCap($n(monthsWorked), 0, $const.acquisitionMonths); $m >= $const.acquisitionMonths ? bandDaysCorridos : 0)"
    },
    {
      "name": "daysEntitled",
      "type": "number",
      "formula": "$round(daysCorridosEntitled / $const.daysPerCalendarWeek * $n(daysPerWeek), 1)"
    },
    {
      "name": "daysRemaining",
      "type": "number",
      "formula": "($r := daysEntitled - $n(daysTaken); $r < 0 ? 0 : $round($r, 1))"
    }
  ],
  "testCases": [
    {
      "description": "N1 a clean year is 30 dias corridos, about 21.4 working days on a five-day week",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 30,
        "daysEntitled": 21.4
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N2 five absences is still band I, because the article says 'not more than five'",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 5,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 30
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N3 the sixth absence costs six days of leave at once",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 6,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 24,
        "daysEntitled": 17.1
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N4 the seventh costs nothing further — the band is flat to fourteen",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 14,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 24
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N5 fifteen absences drops to 18 corridos",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 15,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 18,
        "daysEntitled": 12.9
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N6 twenty-four drops to the lowest band, 12 corridos or about 8.6 working days",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 24,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 12,
        "daysEntitled": 8.6
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N7 thirty-two is the last banded value",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 32,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 12
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N8 above thirty-two art. 130 supplies no band at all",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 33,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "bandDaysCorridos": 0,
        "daysEntitled": 0
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N9 the right is acquired AFTER twelve months, so eleven earns nothing",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 11,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "daysCorridosEntitled": 0,
        "daysEntitled": 0
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N10 a six-day week gets more working days out of the same 30 corridos",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
        "daysPerWeek": 6,
        "daysTaken": 0
      },
      "expect": {
        "daysEntitled": 25.7
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N11 days already taken come off the remainder",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 10
      },
      "expect": {
        "daysRemaining": 11.4
      }
    },
    {
      "description": "N12 taking more than the entitlement never goes negative",
      "given": {
        "monthsWorked": 12,
        "unjustifiedAbsences": 24,
        "daysPerWeek": 5,
        "daysTaken": 40
      },
      "expect": {
        "daysRemaining": 0
      }
    }
  ],
  "spec": {
    "id": "holiday-entitlement-brazil",
    "version": "1.0.0",
    "schema": {
      "type": "object",
      "properties": {
        "monthsWorked": {
          "type": "number",
          "maximum": 12,
          "minimum": 0
        },
        "unjustifiedAbsences": {
          "type": "number",
          "maximum": 60,
          "minimum": 0
        },
        "daysPerWeek": {
          "type": "number",
          "maximum": 7,
          "minimum": 1
        },
        "daysTaken": {
          "type": "number",
          "minimum": 0
        },
        "bandDaysCorridos": {
          "type": "number",
          "readOnly": true
        },
        "daysCorridosEntitled": {
          "type": "number",
          "readOnly": true
        },
        "daysEntitled": {
          "type": "number",
          "readOnly": true
        },
        "daysRemaining": {
          "type": "number",
          "readOnly": true
        }
      }
    },
    "constants": {
      "acquisitionMonths": 12,
      "bandDaysTo5Absences": 30,
      "bandDaysTo14Absences": 24,
      "bandDaysTo23Absences": 18,
      "bandDaysTo32Absences": 12,
      "absenceLimit5": 5,
      "absenceLimit14": 14,
      "absenceLimit23": 23,
      "absenceLimit32": 32,
      "daysPerCalendarWeek": 7
    },
    "library": {
      "layers": [
        {
          "id": "statutory",
          "define": "(\n  /* Shared statutory helpers — the canonical copy (docs/sandbox/d8-statutory-families.md §5.4).\n     DO NOT EDIT A SPEC'S INLINED COPY. Edit this file and run `npm run sync:helpers`; a vitest\n     assertion and a Java assertion both require every inlined copy to be byte-identical to this one.\n\n     Why inlined rather than referenced: the `library` section's `ref` form — a library shared\n     between models — is still proposed, gated on the model-references design (see\n     ../../../../docs/design/library/jsonata-library.md). Inlining keeps each spec self-contained,\n     which is what lets `#e=` embedding, `#share=` import and MCP forking work with no resolver.\n\n     TWO TRAPS, both of which fail SILENTLY and both of which bit during the debt-payoff build:\n\n       1. A library function sees ONLY its arguments. It cannot read the consuming document — not\n          through a bare field name, not through `$`, not through `$$`. Everything these helpers\n          need is passed in. (`$const` is late-bound and so would resolve, but relying on it would\n          couple a shared helper to one spec's constant names.)\n       2. ONE null member wrecks a whole aggregate, and the two engines disagree about how. The JS\n          reference implementation THROWS (\"Argument 1 of function sum must be an array of\n          numbers\"); the Java port can instead yield null for the entire aggregate. Neither gives a\n          partial total, and the null-yielding form is the dangerous one because it is silent. So\n          callers coerce with `$n()` below before aggregating, which makes the behaviour identical\n          in both engines — measured, not assumed: see helpers.test.ts.\n\n       3. A PATH STEP DIRECTLY ON A CALL RESULT RETURNS NOTHING in the Java engine. This matters for\n          every caller of $amortize, which is the one helper here returning an object:\n\n              $amortize(p, r, n, 0).months            -> empty in Java, 360 in JS.  WRONG\n              ($a := $amortize(p, r, n, 0); $a.months) -> 360 in both.               RIGHT\n\n          Bind the result to a variable, then step into it. The JS reference accepts both forms, so\n          this is invisible until the page is served by the real engine, and it fails as a blank\n          field rather than an error. Measured with a probe, not inferred — the field simply does\n          not appear. */\n\n  /* Number coercion with an explicit zero default. The guard against trap 2. */\n  $n := function($v) { $v = null or $not($exists($v)) ? 0 : $number($v) };\n\n  /* ISO date -> its year / month / day parts. String slicing rather than $fromMillis formatting:\n     these are statutory dates (\"2026-04-06\"), and a timezone-sensitive round-trip through millis\n     can shift the day, which silently moves a service anniversary across a band boundary. */\n  $isoY := function($d) { $number($substring($d, 0, 4)) };\n  $isoM := function($d) { $number($substring($d, 5, 2)) };\n  $isoD := function($d) { $number($substring($d, 8, 2)) };\n\n  /* Whole years of completed service between two ISO dates. Counts an anniversary as reached only\n     when the month-and-day has arrived, which is what \"completed years of service\" means in every\n     severance statute — not a 365.25-day division, whose drift crosses a 5-year band boundary in\n     the wrong direction roughly one year in four. */\n  $yearsBetween := function($from, $to) { (\n    $y := $isoY($to) - $isoY($from);\n    $beforeAnniversary := $isoM($to) < $isoM($from)\n      or ($isoM($to) = $isoM($from) and $isoD($to) < $isoD($from));\n    $beforeAnniversary ? $y - 1 : $y\n  ) };\n\n  /* Whole completed months between two ISO dates, same convention. */\n  $monthsBetween := function($from, $to) { (\n    $m := ($isoY($to) - $isoY($from)) * 12 + ($isoM($to) - $isoM($from));\n    $isoD($to) < $isoD($from) ? $m - 1 : $m\n  ) };\n\n  /* Inclusive count of days between two ISO dates — both endpoints counted, because a leave year\n     runs from its first day to its last and an employee present on both is present for both.\n     Pro-rata accrual is then $proRataDays(a, b) / $proRataDays(yearStart, yearEnd). */\n  $proRataDays := function($from, $to) {\n    ($toMillis($to) - $toMillis($from)) / 86400000 + 1\n  };\n\n  /* Progressive charge across bands. `$bands` is ordered lowest-first, each {\"upTo\": n, \"rate\": r};\n     the final band's `upTo` is omitted or null to mean \"no ceiling\". Each band's rate applies ONLY\n     to the slice of the amount inside it — the single most common error in a hand-written bracket\n     walk is applying the top rate to the whole amount. Returns 0 for a non-positive amount. */\n  $bandedCharge := function($amount, $bands) { (\n    $a := $n($amount);\n    $a <= 0 ? 0 : $reduce($bands, function($acc, $band) { (\n      $ceiling := $exists($band.upTo) and $band.upTo != null ? $band.upTo : $a;\n      $top := $ceiling < $a ? $ceiling : $a;\n      $slice := $top - $acc.floor;\n      {\n        \"floor\": $top > $acc.floor ? $top : $acc.floor,\n        \"charge\": $acc.charge + ($slice > 0 ? $slice * $n($band.rate) : 0)\n      }\n    ) }, {\"floor\": 0, \"charge\": 0}).charge\n  ) };\n\n  /* Clamp into [floor, cap]. Either bound may be omitted (null) to leave that side open — a benefit\n     with a cap and no floor is as common as one with both. */\n  $clampFloorCap := function($value, $floor, $cap) { (\n    $v := $n($value);\n    $withFloor := $exists($floor) and $floor != null and $v < $floor ? $floor : $v;\n    $exists($cap) and $cap != null and $withFloor > $cap ? $cap : $withFloor\n  ) };\n\n  /* Level annuity payment for a principal over `$months` at `$annualRatePct` nominal, compounded\n     monthly. Falls back to straight-line division at a zero rate, where the standard formula\n     divides by zero. */\n  $annuityPayment := function($principal, $annualRatePct, $months) { (\n    $p := $n($principal);\n    $m := $n($months);\n    $i := $n($annualRatePct) / 1200;\n    $m <= 0 ? 0 : ($i = 0 ? $p / $m : $p * $i * $power(1 + $i, $m) / ($power(1 + $i, $m) - 1))\n  ) };\n\n  /* Amortisation schedule: one row per month until the balance clears or `$months` is reached.\n     Returns {\"payment\", \"months\", \"totalInterest\", \"schedule\": [{month, interest, principal,\n     balance}]}. `$extra` is an optional monthly overpayment.\n\n     A real month-by-month fold rather than a closed form, because an overpayment changes every\n     later row — the same reason debt-payoff simulates. Bounded by `$months`, so it always\n     terminates. */\n  $amortize := function($principal, $annualRatePct, $months, $extra) { (\n    $i := $n($annualRatePct) / 1200;\n    $pay := $annuityPayment($principal, $annualRatePct, $months) + $n($extra);\n    $r := $reduce([1..$n($months)], function($acc, $month) {\n      $acc.balance <= 0 ? $acc : (\n        /* The running balance is kept UNROUNDED and only the emitted row is rounded. Rounding the\n           balance each month instead accumulates drift: at 200,000 over 360 months it left 2.83\n           still owing in the final row, which would break the \"final balance is zero\" invariant\n           (§7.3) and look to a reader like the schedule does not pay the loan off. Lenders compute\n           on the exact balance and adjust the last payment, which is what this does. */\n        $interest := $acc.balance * $i;\n        $due := $acc.balance + $interest < $pay ? $acc.balance + $interest : $pay;\n        $principalPart := $due - $interest;\n        $balance := $acc.balance - $principalPart;\n        {\n          \"balance\": $balance,\n          \"totalInterest\": $acc.totalInterest + $interest,\n          \"schedule\": $append($acc.schedule, [{\n            \"month\": $month,\n            \"interest\": $round($interest, 2),\n            \"principal\": $round($principalPart, 2),\n            \"balance\": $round($balance, 2)\n          }])\n        }\n      )\n    }, {\"balance\": $n($principal), \"totalInterest\": 0, \"schedule\": []});\n    {\n      \"payment\": $round($pay, 2),\n      \"months\": $count($r.schedule),\n      \"totalInterest\": $round($r.totalInterest, 2),\n      \"schedule\": [$r.schedule]\n    }\n  ) };\n\n  [\"n\", \"isoY\", \"isoM\", \"isoD\", \"yearsBetween\", \"monthsBetween\", \"proRataDays\",\n   \"bandedCharge\", \"clampFloorCap\", \"annuityPayment\", \"amortize\"]\n)\n"
        }
      ]
    },
    "defaultValues": [
      {
        "path": "$",
        "expr": "{ 'monthsWorked': 12, 'unjustifiedAbsences': 0, 'daysPerWeek': 5, 'daysTaken': 0 }"
      }
    ],
    "derivations": [
      {
        "path": "$.bandDaysCorridos",
        "expr": "($a := $n(unjustifiedAbsences); $a <= $const.absenceLimit5 ? $const.bandDaysTo5Absences : ($a <= $const.absenceLimit14 ? $const.bandDaysTo14Absences : ($a <= $const.absenceLimit23 ? $const.bandDaysTo23Absences : ($a <= $const.absenceLimit32 ? $const.bandDaysTo32Absences : 0))))"
      },
      {
        "path": "$.daysCorridosEntitled",
        "expr": "($m := $clampFloorCap($n(monthsWorked), 0, $const.acquisitionMonths); $m >= $const.acquisitionMonths ? bandDaysCorridos : 0)"
      },
      {
        "path": "$.daysEntitled",
        "expr": "$round(daysCorridosEntitled / $const.daysPerCalendarWeek * $n(daysPerWeek), 1)"
      },
      {
        "path": "$.daysRemaining",
        "expr": "($r := daysEntitled - $n(daysTaken); $r < 0 ? 0 : $round($r, 1))"
      }
    ],
    "constraints": [],
    "viewDefinition": {
      "renderer": "builtin",
      "defaultView": "main",
      "views": [
        {
          "id": "main",
          "label": "Férias",
          "layout": "vertical",
          "components": [
            {
              "id": "note",
              "type": "staticText",
              "text": "Art. 130 da CLT: “Após cada período de 12 (doze) meses de vigência do contrato de trabalho, o empregado terá direito a férias, na seguinte proporção: I - 30 (trinta) dias corridos, quando não houver faltado ao serviço mais de 5 (cinco) vezes.” Brazil is the only country in this comparison whose entitlement FALLS, and the absence count is not a penalty beside the figure — it is the band table itself. Six unjustified absences cost six days of leave; the seventh costs nothing."
            },
            {
              "id": "inputs",
              "type": "fieldSet",
              "label": "Seus dados",
              "components": [
                {
                  "id": "monthsWorked",
                  "type": "numericField",
                  "label": "Months completed in this período aquisitivo",
                  "bind": "$.monthsWorked",
                  "helperText": "The right is acquired AFTER each twelve months, so it does not accrue month by month inside one."
                },
                {
                  "id": "unjustifiedAbsences",
                  "type": "numericField",
                  "label": "Unjustified absences (faltas) in the period",
                  "bind": "$.unjustifiedAbsences",
                  "helperText": "0–5 gives 30 dias corridos, 6–14 gives 24, 15–23 gives 18, 24–32 gives 12."
                },
                {
                  "id": "daysPerWeek",
                  "type": "numericField",
                  "label": "Days you work per week",
                  "bind": "$.daysPerWeek",
                  "helperText": "Converts dias corridos into your own working days."
                },
                {
                  "id": "daysTaken",
                  "type": "numericField",
                  "label": "Days already taken",
                  "bind": "$.daysTaken"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "id": "sep",
              "type": "separatorLine"
            },
            {
              "id": "entitledTile",
              "type": "statTile",
              "label": "Working days entitled",
              "value": "$.daysEntitled"
            },
            {
              "id": "remainingTile",
              "type": "statTile",
              "label": "Working days remaining",
              "value": "$.daysRemaining"
            },
            {
              "id": "breakdown",
              "type": "keyValueList",
              "label": "How that is worked out",
              "items": [
                {
                  "label": "Band under art. 130 (dias corridos)",
                  "value": "$.bandDaysCorridos"
                },
                {
                  "label": "Dias corridos actually granted",
                  "value": "$.daysCorridosEntitled"
                }
              ]
            },
            {
              "id": "assumptions",
              "type": "staticText",
              "text": "Dias corridos are consecutive CALENDAR days, weekends inside, so 30 of them is about 21,4 working days on a five-day week — the same figure Spain’s 30 días naturales gives by a different rule. Seven days to a calendar week is arithmetic rather than law and is declared as such below. Art. 130’s four bands stop at 32 absences and the article supplies no fifth, so above 32 this page reports nothing under art. 130 — that is an exhaustive list being read rather than a figure the statute states. Art. 133’s separate grounds for losing the right are not modelled. Art. 130 § 1º forbids docking the same absences from the leave period a second time, and § 2º counts the leave as service time. Art. 130-A once set smaller bands for part-time contracts but was revoked by Lei 13.467/2017, so part-time work uses the bands above. Art. 143’s abono (selling a third of the leave) and art. 146’s proportional férias on termination are not computed."
            },
            {
              "id": "sources",
              "type": "sourceList",
              "label": "Fontes",
              "layers": 1,
              "exempt": [
                "daysPerCalendarWeek"
              ],
              "items": [
                {
                  "label": "CLT (Decreto-Lei 5.452/1943) art. 130 — planalto.gov.br (férias after each twelve months; 30, 24, 18 and 12 dias corridos by unjustified absences)",
                  "url": "https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del5452.htm",
                  "date": "2026-10-11",
                  "covers": [
                    "acquisitionMonths",
                    "bandDaysTo5Absences",
                    "bandDaysTo14Absences",
                    "bandDaysTo23Absences",
                    "bandDaysTo32Absences",
                    "absenceLimit5",
                    "absenceLimit14",
                    "absenceLimit23",
                    "absenceLimit32"
                  ]
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    "tests": [
      {
        "description": "N1 a clean year is 30 dias corridos, about 21.4 working days on a five-day week",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 30,
          "$.daysEntitled": 21.4
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N2 five absences is still band I, because the article says 'not more than five'",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 5,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 30
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N3 the sixth absence costs six days of leave at once",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 6,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 24,
          "$.daysEntitled": 17.1
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N4 the seventh costs nothing further — the band is flat to fourteen",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 14,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 24
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N5 fifteen absences drops to 18 corridos",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 15,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 18,
          "$.daysEntitled": 12.9
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N6 twenty-four drops to the lowest band, 12 corridos or about 8.6 working days",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 24,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 12,
          "$.daysEntitled": 8.6
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N7 thirty-two is the last banded value",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 32,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 12
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N8 above thirty-two art. 130 supplies no band at all",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 33,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.bandDaysCorridos": 0,
          "$.daysEntitled": 0
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N9 the right is acquired AFTER twelve months, so eleven earns nothing",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 11,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.daysCorridosEntitled": 0,
          "$.daysEntitled": 0
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N10 a six-day week gets more working days out of the same 30 corridos",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 6,
          "$.daysTaken": 0
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.daysEntitled": 25.7
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N11 days already taken come off the remainder",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 0,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 10
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.daysRemaining": 11.4
        }
      },
      {
        "description": "N12 taking more than the entitlement never goes negative",
        "given": {
          "$.monthsWorked": 12,
          "$.unjustifiedAbsences": 24,
          "$.daysPerWeek": 5,
          "$.daysTaken": 40
        },
        "expect": {
          "$.daysRemaining": 0
        }
      }
    ]
  }
}